<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Parisista &#187; netflix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.khaitan.org/blog/category/netflix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.khaitan.org/blog</link>
	<description>2. Etymology: Sanskrit. Supplementary information usually at the end of a writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Where is the New New Thing?</title>
		<link>http://www.khaitan.org/blog/2008/05/where-is-the-new-new-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.khaitan.org/blog/2008/05/where-is-the-new-new-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>indus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Nolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Forenski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.khaitan.org/blog/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Forenski points to Jeff Nolan&#8217;s &#8220;Incremental Is Not Innovation&#8221; piece. With more than $1bn invested in various startups &#8212; only a handful can be called as breakthrough. Last year, it was twitter.  The last bust cycle produced a slew of collaboration tools based on RSS. In his writeup Jeff talks about the futility of Web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2008/04/incremental_is.php">Tom Forenski</a> points to Jeff Nolan&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.sandhill.com/opinion/editorial.php?id=185">Incremental Is Not Innovation</a>&#8221; piece. With more than $1bn invested in various startups &#8212; only a handful can be called as breakthrough. Last year, it was twitter.  The last bust cycle produced a slew of collaboration tools based on RSS. In his writeup Jeff talks about the futility of Web 2.0 (the version number exists, thanks to a marketing propaganda!) and me-too culture of startups around it.</p>
<p>However, in a bigger picture, Web 2.0 has created a phenomenon that services can live elsewhere, and so can the data. It has also created a new breed of entrepreneurs who are going to solve a newer set of problems in the continuing evolution of the overall Internet and computing landscape.</p>
<p>In my mind some of the big problems to be solved are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Public Information Overload: Average query on Google produces 100,000+ search results. The popular ones have 100,000+ <em>pages</em> of search results. Why do I need more than 3-5 pages of results?</li>
<li>Untargeted advertising: Bulk of the ads are still unrelated. I was searching/looking for a used Aeron chair, today. The best deal is on Craigslist. Why no one is connecting that dot? A person&#8217;s intent is very much monetizable and the field is still green</li>
<li>Compartmentalized information: If I&#8217;m browsing for a movie on Netflix, I cannot see the reviews of that movie from my buddies who are not on Netflix</li>
<li>Missing reputation: Is that post/comment about fixing unscruplous hedging of commodities coming from a person working in financial business or a wannabe?</li>
<li>Private Information Overload: With 10,000+ digital family photos, I can&#8217;t search a thing. In my last job I had 5+ GB of PSTs at the time of quitting. Same goes for my slowly building archive of digital documents, tax returns and stuff</li>
</ul>
<p>These are very broad level categories of very large problems, each one can be further broken down into features. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.khaitan.org/blog/2008/05/where-is-the-new-new-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

